Submitted by Pensionnaire on Tue, 2000-08-08 21:40
In basic quadrupede
MX[@*:-.4,2:-2.890,1 :-1.808](RX(FX,),MX[@-1
:1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387][|-1 :1.287,0:.5](rX(,X),,RX(X,)),rX(,FX))
we have
[@-1 :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387]
why not
[@-1 :1.849,0:1.703] ?
Forums:
Re: Quadrupede
> In basic quadrupede
> MX[@*:-.4,2:-2.890,1 :-1.808](RX(FX,),MX[@-1
> :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387][|-1 :1.287,0:.5](rX(,X),,RX(X,)),rX(,FX))
> we have
> [@-1 :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387]
> why not
> [@-1 :1.849,0:1.703] ?
you mean, 1.707? (=3.094-1.387)
It is because NN of this creature was evolved, and evolution
means redundancy and randomness.
Re: Quadrupede
> > In basic quadrupede
> > MX[@*:-.4,2:-2.890,1 :-1.808](RX(FX,),MX[@-1
> > :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387][|-1 :1.287,0:.5](rX(,X),,RX(X,)),rX(,FX))
> > we have
> > [@-1 :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387]
> > why not
> > [@-1 :1.849,0:1.703] ?
>
> you mean, 1.707? (=3.094-1.387)
sure.
> It is because NN of this creature was evolved, and evolution
> means redundancy and randomness.
Ok. Just strange for a sample.
--
by ABB.
alainbb@mailclub.net
http://gallery.uunet.be/AlainBB