Quadrupede 

In basic quadrupede
MX[@*:-.4,2:-2.890,1 :-1.808](RX(FX,),MX[@-1
:1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387][|-1 :1.287,0:.5](rX(,X),,RX(X,)),rX(,FX))
we have
[@-1 :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387]
why not
[@-1 :1.849,0:1.703] ?

alainbb@mailclub.net

Forums: 
Maciej Komosinski's picture

> In basic quadrupede
> MX[@*:-.4,2:-2.890,1 :-1.808](RX(FX,),MX[@-1
> :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387][|-1 :1.287,0:.5](rX(,X),,RX(X,)),rX(,FX))
> we have
> [@-1 :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387]
> why not
> [@-1 :1.849,0:1.703] ?

you mean, 1.707? (=3.094-1.387)
It is because NN of this creature was evolved, and evolution
means redundancy and randomness.

> > In basic quadrupede
> > MX[@*:-.4,2:-2.890,1 :-1.808](RX(FX,),MX[@-1
> > :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387][|-1 :1.287,0:.5](rX(,X),,RX(X,)),rX(,FX))
> > we have
> > [@-1 :1.849,0:3.094,0:-1.387]
> > why not
> > [@-1 :1.849,0:1.703] ?
>
> you mean, 1.707? (=3.094-1.387)

sure.

> It is because NN of this creature was evolved, and evolution
> means redundancy and randomness.

Ok. Just strange for a sample.

--
by ABB.
alainbb@mailclub.net
http://gallery.uunet.be/AlainBB