Submitted by Zachary Strider... on Sat, 2001-02-17 00:54
Here is a sample from the website:
((rrLMMQX[0:-1.822, *:2.785, /:-999.000, *:0.868,
T:-351.455]
LCCCCMMMMMX[*:3.400, /:3.882, 0:-2.068] [|T:-1.424, 0:0.706]
[|T:0.512, 0:-1.589]), qWX,)
And here is a fram I evolved.
((rrLAMMSIQX[0 :-1.802, *:538.462, /:1.358,
*:1.316,T:-341.906]),,X[@S:1.489,0:0.768],,(rrLAMMSIQX[0:-1.822,*:2.785,
/:-811.358, *:1.020,
T:-341.906]rLACCMIX[*:3.412,/:-811.358,0:-1.945][|T:-1.133,0:0.768][|T:-1.683,0:2.929,-5:-.5]))
Look familiar?
There are oddly similar in a lot of ways. Even the numbers
aren't far off, mainly concerning the mechanism of
movement. Yet, I did not grow one from the other.
Interesting.
Zach
Forums:
Re: Convergent evolution
And look at this one from the same pool as the other:
((rrLAMMSIQX[0 :-1.802, *:538.462, /:1.358, *:1.316,T:-341.906]LACCCCMMMMMSIX[*:3.412,
/:3.722,0:-1.945][|T:-1.133,0:0.768][|T:-768.335,0:-0.727,2:-.551]),,X[@S:1.489,0:0.768],,rrLAMMSIQX[0:-1.822,*:2.785,
/:-811.358, *:1.020, T:-341.906])
Same idea. Not surprising, though, as the two are from the same set. All the same, I though it
was interesting.