Submitted by Richard Nauber on Mon, 2003-12-29 20:18
When I try to create more than three genotype groups, the message "A
component named _1 already exists." is shown.
Here are some lines from my experiment definition:
...
~
code:~
onExpDefLoad:
GenotypeLibrary.clear();
GenotypeGroup.name="Genepool 1";
Simulator.print("Genepool 1");
GenotypeLibrary.addGroup("Genepool 2");
Simulator.print("Genepool 2");
GenotypeLibrary.addGroup("Genepool 3");
Simulator.print("Genepool 3");
GenotypeLibrary.addGroup("Genepool 4");
Simulator.print("Genepool 4");
GenotypeLibrary.addGroup("Genepool 5");
Simulator.print("Genepool 5");
...
Forums:
Re: Multiple Genotype Groups
> When I try to create more than three genotype groups, the message "A
> component named _1 already exists." is shown.
Yes, this problem was already reported. It is a Windows
problem :-( and it has been worked around, wait for GUI v2.9.
You can also use the command-line which is not affected
by this problem.
MacKo
Re: Multiple Genotype Groups
> Yes, this problem was already reported. It is a Windows
> problem :-( and it has been worked around, wait for GUI v2.9.
>
> You can also use the command-line which is not affected
> by this problem.
Hallo Maciej,
thanks for your answer and for one of the most interresting
alife-programms I've seen.
But I have another suggestion/bug (?):
The functions
Loader.loadObject(); and
GenotypeLibrary.copyGenotype(group);
do not keep the user1 value.
Are the user values thought for saving genotype specific informations? I
would like to use them to save the lowest distance to an given target
point (and then use it in the fitness formula)
Thanks for your help,
Richard
Re: Multiple Genotype Groups
Richard Nauber wrote:
[...]
> But I have another suggestion/bug (?):
> The functions
> Loader.loadObject(); and
> GenotypeLibrary.copyGenotype(group);
> do not keep the user1 value.
> Are the user values thought for saving genotype specific informations? I
> would like to use them to save the lowest distance to an given target
> point (and then use it in the fitness formula)
yes, you're right.
user1/2/3 values should be preserved by all genotype functions.
thank you for reporting this bug, it will be fixed in the next release.
sz.